Cookies help us deliver our services. By using our services, you agree to our use of cookies. More information

COST Action MitoEAGLE

From Bioblast
Revision as of 15:31, 12 October 2016 by Gnaiger Erich (talk | contribs)


MiPsociety
News and Events        
BEC 2020.1 Mitochondrial physiology
       
MitoEAGLE
        Working Groups         Short-Term Scientific Missions         Management Committee         Members        
MitoGlobal
   


EU-logo.jpg

COST Action CA15203 (2016-2021): MitoEAGLE
Evolution-Age-Gender-Lifestyle-Environment: mitochondrial fitness mapping


COST Action MitoEAGLE



COST Policies.png

MITOEAGLE - how it flies

This is the roadmap of the project; yet the expression "how it flies" belongs to EAGLE.


» Upcoming MITOEAGLE Events
  • 2017-03-21 to 2017-03-23 Barcelona (ES) Management Committee Meeting, WG Meetings
  • 2016-11-15 to 2016-11-17 Verona (IT) First Core Group Meeting, WG1 and WG4 Meeting
Grant periods
GP Start Date End Date
1 2016-11-01 2017-04-30
2 2017-05-01 2018-04-30
3 2018-05-01 2019-04-30
4 2019-05-01 2020-04-30
5 2020-05-01 2020-09-11 (end of the Action)


MITOEAGLE track record

Approval and Memorandum of Understanding

  • 2016-09-12 Brussels (BE) Start of the COST Action CA15203 MITOEAGLE: »COST MC Meeting 2016 Brussels BE
  • 2016-07-25 The Action Science Officer (SO) communicated the budget of the upcoming Grant Period (68,000 EUR: 2016-11-01 to 2017-04-30) to the Action Proposer. »More details.
  • 2016 Jul 07-13 The MitoFit Science Camp 2016 Kuehtai AT addressed key topics of the MITOEAGLE project and provided a key opportunity to prepare the 1st MC Meeting. » More details
2016-02-26 Memorandum of Understanding (MoU) published in e-COST:
» http://w3.cost.eu/fileadmin/domain_files/CA/Action_CA15203/mou/CA15203-e.pdf
2016-02-12 MITOEAGLE proposal approved » MITOEAGLE evaluation highlights

MITOEAGLE evaluation highlights

The large number of proposers spread across many EU countries and employed in a range of sectors is an early indication of the relevance and timeliness of this study.


Highlights: The main strengths are

  • The idea of establishing a standardized database of mitochondrial data, with continuous monitoring and updating of SOPs.
  • The set up of data sets for mt-function for different tissues in a standardized format.
  • The ambition to coordinate researchers whose research activity is focused on mitochondrial physiology, but that work in different fields.
  • The will to go beyond the spirit of strong competition that characterized research on mitochondria.
  • The proposal addresses the considerable lack of uniformity and consensus on standard operating procedures in the design and implementation of research protocols involving mitochondrial physiology. This is a very real problem that can only be solved through networks on a scale such as this Action, that will work to harmonise experimental protocols across research groups.
  • The will to reach standardized protocols and ways of data presentation, that will allow an easy cross comparison of data; this aim has been reached in many other fields of research (e.g flow cytometry data, microarray analysis).
  • The ambition to pool together data from different groups, in order to get the statistical power that could not be reached by single, small research groups.
  • To the best of my knowledge, I cannot remember similar networks in Europe, in terms of dimensions and ambition.
  • Several significant risks to the successful completion of the Action have been identified. These include the difficulty in standardising experimental protocols, variability in quality control standards and failure of the consortium to agree on specific standards.
  • The breadth of membership that is already evident in this consortium underscores the importance and significance of the aims and objectives of this Action.


Highlights: Suggestions by reviewers

  • The inclusion of a WP with specific responsibility for dissemination and training could be considered. - For example, the education programme for use of the MITOEAGLE data base could be the responsibility of the new WP.
  • This Action will benefit from a more comprehensive analysis of its long term impact on European society; as an example, the proponents say that this Action will help to distinguish noise from truth in the field of mitochondrial biology: many "noisy data" on mitochondria and the process of aging, which has a crucial impact on the society and economies of Europe.


Comment of the Scientific Committee

  • The proposed Action must develop and implement specific plans to increase the involvement of Early Career Investigators and for maintaining and monitoring gender balance.


Full Evaluation report

» MITOEAGLE_COST-Evaluation2016-02-12.pdf.

From the MITOEAGLE COST Consensus Evaluation Report


Submission

2015-09-08 MITOEAGLE proposal submitted
» MITOEAGLE circulars


Selected COST terms

» Full COST glossary
COST Action
means the COST pan-European networking instrument (such as MITOEAGLE) allowing researchers, engineers or scholars from COST Member Countries and Cooperating State to develop jointly their ideas and new initiatives in a field or topic of common interest.
COST Actions are implemented through a set of networking tools such as meetings (MC meetings, Working Groups, workshops, conferences), Short-Term Scientific Missions (STSMs), Training Schools and Dissemination activities.
COST Cooperating State
Israel. Researchers from COST's Cooperating State enjoy member rights in COST Action participation.
COST Member Countries
» COST member countries - COST member countries in bold are represented in the COST MITOEAGLE consortium.
Austria, Belgium, Bosnia and Herzegovina, Bulgaria, Croatia, Cyprus, Czech Republic, Denmark, Estonia, Finland, France, Germany, Greece, Hungary, Iceland, Ireland, Italy, Latvia, Lithuania, Luxembourg, Malta, Montenegro, Netherlands, Norway, Poland, Portugal, Romania, Serbia, Slovakia, Slovenia, Spain, Sweden, Switzerland, Turkey, United Kingdom and the former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia.
COST National Coordinator (CNC) - »COST
means the individuals appointed by the COST Member Countries and Cooperating State in charge of confirming the acceptance of the Action Memorandum of Understanding and responsible for nominating the Management Committee members of their country and the evaluators for the Review Panels pool of Experts.
Dissemination
means the public disclosure of COST Action’s results and/or outcomes by any appropriate means (other than resulting from protecting or exploiting the results), including by scientific publications in any media.
COST Actions shall favour Open Access to results and outcomes published thanks to COST funding. Specific provisions linked to the management, sharing or exploitation of Intellectual Property that may rise from a COST Action shall be defined by the respective Action participants, and lies within their sole discretion/responsibility.
Early Career Investigator (ECI)
means a researcher in the time span of up to 8 years after the date of obtaining the PhD/doctorate (full-time equivalent). Periods of career leave have to be added to this time span (see ESR in COST gloassary).
Grant Holder
means the legal entity responsible for the administrative and financial implementation of the COST Action. The Grant Holder for MITOEAGLE is the Medical University Innsbruck.
Inclusiveness Target Countries (ITC)
Countries in bold are represented in MITOEAGLE:
Bosnia-Herzigovina, Bulgaria, Cyprus, Czech Republic, Estonia, Croatia, Hungary, Lithuania, Latvia, Lusembourg, Malta, Montenegro, Poland, Portugal, Romania, Slovenia, Slovakia, the former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia, Republic of Serbia, Turkey
Management Committee (MC)
»Management Committee
Participant - Action Participant
means any researcher, engineer or scholar who participates actively in a COST Action.
The reimbursement of expenses incurred by participants, other than those incurred by the MC Members, depends on the fulfilment of the COST eligibility criteria for reimbursement and is always subject to the availability of COST funds.
Researchers from Near Neighbour Countries are eligible for reimbursement, whereas researchers from International Partner Countries are not.
Short-Term Scientific Missions (STSM)
These Missions (Inter-laboratory Exchange Visits) aim at strengthening the existing COST Actions by allowing scientists to go to an institution or laboratory in another COST country to foster collaboration, to learn a new technique or to take measurements using instruments and/or methods not available in their own institution/laboratory. They are particularly intended for Early Career Investigators.
Working Groups (WG)
The scientific work of the Actions is organised through Working Groups. - Four Working Groups in MITOEAGLE.

COST websites

» Website COST Actions
» Join a COST Action
» COST Countries
» COST administration - getting started
» COST Action Networking Tools
» HELP for COST Action participants: Glossary