Difference between revisions of "MiPNet10.05 O2-Concentration-Flux"
From Bioblast
Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
|title=Gnaiger E (2005-2010) From oxygen concentration to oxygen flux. Mitochondr Physiol Network 10.05. - ''New edition:'' [[Gnaiger_2012_MitoPathways|Gnaiger 2012 Chapter 1]]. | |title=Gnaiger E (2005-2010) From oxygen concentration to oxygen flux. Mitochondr Physiol Network 10.05. - ''New edition:'' [[Gnaiger_2012_MitoPathways|Gnaiger 2012 Chapter 1]]. | ||
|info=[http://www.oroboros.at/?Gnaiger_2012_MitoPathways Gnaiger 2012 MitoPathways], [http://www.oroboros.at/index.php?id=o2-conc-flux MiPNet10.05] | |info=[http://www.oroboros.at/?Gnaiger_2012_MitoPathways Gnaiger 2012 MitoPathways], [http://www.oroboros.at/index.php?id=o2-conc-flux MiPNet10.05] | ||
|year= | |year=2005 | ||
|journal=Mitochondr Physiol Network | |journal=Mitochondr Physiol Network | ||
|abstract=In a closed oxygraph chamber, the oxygen concentration declines over time as a result of respiratory processes. The time derivative, therefore, is a negative number. Why is then the ‘rate of oxygen consumption’ not expressed as a negative value? Why is the term ‘oxygen flux’ used in this context of chemical reactions? The rationale is based on fundamental concepts of physical chemistry and non-equilibrium thermodynamics. | |abstract=In a closed oxygraph chamber, the oxygen concentration declines over time as a result of respiratory processes. The time derivative, therefore, is a negative number. Why is then the ‘rate of oxygen consumption’ not expressed as a negative value? Why is the term ‘oxygen flux’ used in this context of chemical reactions? The rationale is based on fundamental concepts of physical chemistry and non-equilibrium thermodynamics. |
Revision as of 07:58, 25 August 2013
Gnaiger E (2005-2010) From oxygen concentration to oxygen flux. Mitochondr Physiol Network 10.05. - New edition: Gnaiger 2012 Chapter 1. |
» Gnaiger 2012 MitoPathways, MiPNet10.05
Abstract: In a closed oxygraph chamber, the oxygen concentration declines over time as a result of respiratory processes. The time derivative, therefore, is a negative number. Why is then the ‘rate of oxygen consumption’ not expressed as a negative value? Why is the term ‘oxygen flux’ used in this context of chemical reactions? The rationale is based on fundamental concepts of physical chemistry and non-equilibrium thermodynamics. • Keywords: Archive
• O2k-Network Lab: AT_Innsbruck_OROBOROS
Labels:
O2k-SOP